Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Soto v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv01561
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Francisco Soto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Angel Soto v. U.S. Attorney General
as 16-16181
Petitioner:
ANGEL FRANCISCO SOTO
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Roberts, et al. v. City of Chula Vista
as 3:2016cv01955
Plaintiff:
Darrell Roberts , Timothy Abrams , David Albright and others
Defendant:
Chula Vista, City of and Does 1 Through 10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Stephens et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00219
Plaintiff:
James Stephens , Marvin Freeman , Robert Blevins and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Eli Lilly and Company , Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Soto v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2014fp00293
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Petitioner:
Francisco Soto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stephens et al v. McKesson et al
as 3:2013cv04406
Plaintiff:
James Stephens , Marvin Freeman , Robert Blevins and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Eli Lilly and Company , Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stephens et al v. McKesson et al
as CAN/3:13-cv-04406
Plaintiff:
James Stephens , Marvin Freeman , Robert Blevins and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Soto v. Hudson
as 9:2013cv00187
Petitioner:
Francisco Soto
Defendant:
D. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Crespo et al v. Downtown Towing Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv21263
Plaintiff:
Jorge Crespo , Robin Marin , Hector Trejo and others
Defendant:
Downtown Towing Company, Inc. , Dagmar R. Del Rosal and Timothy R. Del Rosal
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
