Cases 11 - 20 of 111
Howard v. Bailey et al
as 3:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Michael Howard
Defendant:
Bailey, Washoe County Sheriff's Offfice, Sparks Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ORNDORF v. FYE et al
as 3:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
CARLA ORNDORF
Defendant:
SHAWN FYE, AUSTIN MILLER, DOUGLAS CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Timmons v. Kertes et al
as 1:2021cv02157
Plaintiff:
Brandon Timmons
Defendant:
H. Kertes, John Wetzel, Kevin Ransom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fye v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2021cv04215
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L Fye
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Fye v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00819
Plaintiff:
James Fye
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FYE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv41751
Plaintiff:
TANNER G FYE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fye-Vanetten v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00520
Plaintiff:
Tammy I. Fye-Vanetten
Defendant:
commissioner of social security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Fye v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv14083
Plaintiff:
Richard Eugene Fye, III
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Charles Capp, et al v. KushCo Holdings, Inc., et al
as 20-56321
Defendant / Appellee:
NICHOLAS KOVACEVICH, CHRISTOPHER TEDFORD, KUSHCO HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES CAPP, MUN FYE CHANG and RICHARD DIAMOND, Lead plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
