Cases 11 - 20 of 119
Elam v. Town of Waxhaw et al
as 3:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Edwin Elam
Defendant:
Town of Waxhaw, Steve Maher, Brenda Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ferguson v. Pope et al
as 5:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Kasha M. Ferguson
Defendant:
John L. Pope, Jr. and YRC Inc. doing business as YRC Freight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Hamrick et al v. Rutherford County et al
as 1:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Michelle Hamrick and Hayley Harrison
Defendant:
Rutherford County, John K Carroll, Kimber Dover-Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
FRANCE v. VEAL et al
as 1:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. FRANCE
Defendant:
L. VEAL, LAVALLEY, B. FERGUSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
PANNACHIA v. CITY OF DURHAM et al
as 1:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
JERRY E. PANNACHIA and JERRY E. PANNACHIA, III
Defendant:
CITY OF DURHAM and BOWMAN FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ferguson v. USA
as 5:2021cv00448
Petitioner:
Tevan Immanuel Ferguson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
TYLER v. GREENWOOD et al
as 1:2021cv00488
Defendant:
DYLAN W. GREENWOOD, PROSECTORIAL DISTRICT, J. CLARK FISCHER and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
