Cases 11 - 20 of 21
SUBER v. BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN et al
as 2:2013cv01207
Plaintiff:
SHANICQUA SUBER
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN, MARK FLANDERS and POTTSTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLANDERS CORPORATION v. KENNEDY et al
as 2:2012cv06064
Plaintiff:
FLANDERS CORPORATION
Defendant:
MARK B. KENNEDY and HEATH M. KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FLANDERS v. DZUGAN et al
as 2:2012cv01481
Plaintiff:
EDWARD L. FLANDERS, JR.
Defendant:
FRED DZUGAN and FORD CITY BOROUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILSON v. GALLAGHER et al
as 2:2011cv04352
Plaintiff:
LEROY A. WILSON
Defendant:
JOHN GALLAGHER, REBECCA MOLYLESKI, STEVEN DICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER et al v. BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN BOROUGH HALL et al
as 2:2011cv01939
Plaintiff:
LESLIE HARPER , ALICIA DOWSTER and SHUAH LEVI
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN BOROUGH HALL , POTTSTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT , MICHAEL J. MARKOVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. GALLAGHER et al
as 2:2011cv01876
Plaintiff:
LEROY A. WILSON
Defendant:
JOHN GALLAGHER, REBECCA MOLYLESKI, STEVEN DICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLANDERS v. GARLOCK, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv74074
Plaintiff:
CLAUDE DYSON FLANDERS
Defendant:
GARLOCK, INC. and JOHN CRANE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
STICK et al v. BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN et al
as 2:2008cv05972
Plaintiff:
GERALD C. STICK and DIANE L. STICK
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN, RAY LOPEZ, MARK FLANDERS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JOHNSON v. POTTSTOWN BORO POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2008cv02086
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEE JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant:
POTTSTOWN BORO POLICE DEPARTMENT, TODD RICHARD, MARK FLANDERS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
