Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Frost v. Shinn et al
as 4:2020cv00012
Plaintiff:
Raymond Ludwig Frost
Defendant:
David Shinn, Terry Adriance, Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Land-More Holdings LLC et al v. Frost Gelato Franchising LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00605
Defendant:
Stephen Ochoa, Frost Gelato Franchising LLC, Frost A Gelato Shoppe LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Land-More Holdings LLC, Jacqueline Landry and Melvin Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sherva et al v. Adams Disaster and Restoration Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv05769
Defendant:
Cindy Adams, Unknown Parties, Stanley E Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lewis, Charles Sherva and Russell Jacobson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Swinney v. K.Z. Incorporated et al
as 4:2019cv00225
Defendant:
Star RV LLC, K.Z. Incorporated and Star RV LLC an Arizona corporation doing business as Frost RV
Plaintiff:
Lance Swinney
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Frost Gelato Franchising LLC v. Drumm et al
as 4:2018cv00184
Plaintiff:
Frost Gelato Franchising LLC
Defendant:
H Michael Drumm and Drumm Law LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Frost v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv02309
Petitioner:
Raymond Ludwig Frost
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Camargo v. Frost et al
as 2:2014cv02509
Plaintiff:
Abel Camargo
Defendant:
Eric Frost , Leon Wilmot and Yuma County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frost v. Ryan et al
as 4:2014cv00054
Plaintiff:
Raymond Ludwig Frost
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Barbara French and J Erwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
