Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 173
United States of America v. Smith et al
as 0:2015cv00090
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Sida Kay Smith, Herman L. Smith, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv01852
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
DB50 2011-1 TRUST v. MASTORIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv05726
Defendant: MRS. MICHAEL N. MASTORIS, PRINCETON ANESTHESIA SERVICES, HICKORY RIDGE FARM and others
Plaintiff: DB50 2011-1 TRUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal- Foreclosure
VASSILAT v. GE CAPITAL RETAIL BANK
as 2:2015cv05695
Plaintiff: APHRODITE VASSILAT
Defendant: GE CAPITAL RETAIL BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2015cv01934
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Linda Hart v. Wells Fargo & Company, et al
as 14-11328
Plaintiff - Appellant: LINDA J. HART
Defendant - Appellee: WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, NORDSTROM, NORDSTROM CREDIT SERVICES and others
DONOGHUE v. SYNCHRONY BANK F/K/A/ GE CAPITAL RETAIL BANK
as 1:2014cv01907
Plaintiff: CARRIE DONOGHUE
Defendant: SYNCHRONY BANK F/K/A/ GE CAPITAL RETAIL BANK
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Mavis Watson v. GE Capital Retail Bank
as 2:2014cv08887
Defendant: GE Capital Retail Bank
Plaintiff: Mavis Watson
Mavis Watson v. GE Capital Retail Bank
as 8:2014cv01820
Defendant: GE Capital Retail Bank
Plaintiff: Mavis Watson
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv08875
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?