Cases 11 - 20 of 44
GIDDENS v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 7:2018cv00136
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and ROBERT R LONG
Petitioner:
RICKY GIDDENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Giddens v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv03180
Plaintiff:
Eric Giddens
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hardy v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00172
Plaintiff:
George W. Hardy
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections , Stan Shepard , Bruce Chatman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
George W Hardy
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections , Stan Shepard , Bruce Chatman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giddens v. Drummond et al
as 3:2015cv00112
Plaintiff:
Leonard W. Giddens, Jr.
Defendant:
Kevin Drummond, John Simpson, Peter John Skandalakis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIDDENS et al v. LAWSON et al
as 7:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
RICKY GIDDENS and LYDIA GIDDENS
Defendant:
HUGH LAWSON, W LOUIS SANDS, THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILLIAMSON v. TIFT COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER
as 7:2014cv00195
Plaintiff:
CHAD ALLEN WILLIAMSON
Defendant:
TIFT COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER and GIDDENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Compton v. Perry et al
as 5:2014cv00096
Plaintiff:
Larry Compton
Defendant:
Grady Perry, Corrections Corporation of America, Tam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. COLQUITT COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 7:2014cv00140
Plaintiff:
BRENDA K JOHNSON
Defendant:
COLQUITT COUNTY GEORGIA , LUKE P STRONG , JAMES W GIDDENS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Giddens v. State of Georgia
as 3:2013cv00168
Petitioner:
Leonard W. Giddens, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
