Cases 11 - 20 of 37
MITCHELL v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 1:2019cv00358
Defendant:
Megan M. Dade, Mary Kate O'Neill, Gregory Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Paul F. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUNA v. MASSY et al
as 1:2018cv00144
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. LUNA
Defendant:
MASSY, STEVICK and PA STATE POLICE (GIRARD), RT 18
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States Of America v. Girard et al
as 4:2018cv00219
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Cledith H. Girard and Viola J. Girard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
MITCHELL v. RAHILL et al
as 2:2017cv03730
Plaintiff:
PAUL F. MITCHELL
Defendant:
PATRICK QUINN, GEORGE RAHILL, THOMAS MARTINKA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOLSON v. PB 18 GIRARD STATE POLICE BARRACKS
as 1:2017cv00108
Plaintiff:
ROWENA MOLSON
Defendant:
PB 18 GIRARD STATE POLICE BARRACKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
1716 W. GIRARD AVE LP v. HFM CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv04937
Plaintiff:
1716 W. GIRARD AVE LP
Defendant:
HFM CONSTRUCTION, INC., MELVIN ESPINOZA, PEDRO PALMER CONSTRUCTION INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BISSELL v. GRAVELEY BROTHERS ROOFING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015cv04677
Plaintiff:
RUTH MARY BISSELL
Defendant:
GRAVELEY BROTHERS ROOFING CORPORATION, MICHAEL GRAVELEY, JOHN GRAVELEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
SNOWDEN v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 2:2015cv01912
Petitioner:
JAMES GIRARD SNOWDEN
Respondent:
KAUFFMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
C.R. et al v. Weatherly Area School District et al
as 3:2015cv00201
Plaintiff:
C.R. and H.R.
Defendant:
Weatherly Area School District, Thomas W. McLaaughlin, Girard A. Fewins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
