Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Alfred Zaklit et al v. Global Linguist Solutions LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00314
Plaintiff:
Alfred Zaklit , Hany Shaker and Mokhtar Farag
Defendant:
Global Linguist Solutions, LLC , AECOM Services Inc , DynCorp International LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-36158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alfred Zaklit et al v. Global Linguist Solutions LLC et al
as 2:2013cv08654
Defendant:
AECOM Services Inc, Does, DynCorp International LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mokhtar Farag, Hany Shaker and Alfred Zaklit
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-7165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Zinnekah et al v. Global Linguists Solutions et al
as 1:2013cv01185
Plaintiff:
Ramzi Zinnekah , Maher Al-Masri , Majdi Abdulghani and others
Defendant:
Global Linguists Solutions , Dyncorp International, LLC. and AECOM
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Shee Atika Languages, LLC et al v. Global Linguist Solutions, LLC
as 1:2013cv00850
Plaintiff:
Shee Atika Languages, LLC and The Shee Atika Languages, LLC, Liquidating Trust
Defendant:
Global Linguist Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-35987
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mohamed Kuku v. KMS Solutions, LLC
as 12-2425
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMED KUKU
Defendant - Appellee:
KMS SOLUTIONS, LLC and GLOBAL LINGUIST SOLUTIONS, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
