Cases 11 - 20 of 119
Gonzales v. State of Ohio
as 3:2021cv00716
Petitioner:
Jamie Gonzales
Respondent:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gonzales v. Davol, Inc./ C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00871
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./ C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzales v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00093
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Julia Villarreal Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gonzales v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04916
Plaintiff:
Theresa Gonzales
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Gonzales v. Tinl & Deliman, Attorneys-at-law et al
as 1:2020cv01290
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gonzales
Defendant:
Tinl & Deliman, Attorneys-at-law and Scott Martin Deliman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzales v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01572
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard
Plaintiff:
Louis Frank Gonzales, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Montero et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00632
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Natalia Gonzales and Julio Montero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins et al v. Cintas Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01062
Defendant:
Scott Farner, Robin Lung, cintas and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hawkins, Adam Dipzinski, Leigha Ayres and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
In re: Subpoena to Perkins Coie LLP, in the matter of Steve Snyder-Hill, et al. v. The Ohio State University (S.D. Ohio 2:18-cv-00736-MHW-EPD)
as 2:2019mc00038
In Re:
Perkins Coie LLP
Petitioner:
The Ohio State University
Interested Party:
Kurt Huntsinger, David Mulvin, William Rieffer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
