Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Keenan Wilkins v. County of Alameda, et al
as 12-16170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEENAN G. WILKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, GREG AHERN, Sheriff, JAMES AYALA, Captain and others
Malbrough v. Ahern et al
as 4:2012cv01717
Plaintiff:
Christopher Malbrough
Defendant:
Greg Ahern, Kennedy, Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keenan Wilkins v. Gary Picetti, et al
as 11-16140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEENAN G. WILKINS, AKA Nerrah Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY PICETTI, Judge, Superior Court Alameda County, MICHAEL GAFFEY, Judge, Superior Court Alameda County, JAMES MANN, Public Defender Alameda County and others
Keenan Wilkins v. Greg Ahern, et al
as 10-16958
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEENAN G. WILKINS, AKA Nerrah Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
GREG AHERN, Sheriff, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CRIMINAL JUSTICE MENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT and others
Wilkins v. Picetti
as 4:2010cv02818
Plaintiff:
Keenan G. Wilkins
Defendant:
Gary Picetti, Michael Gaffey, James Mann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. Picetti
as 5:2010cv02818
Plaintiff:
Keenan G. Wilkins
Defendant:
Gary Picetti, Michael Gaffey, James Mann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkins v. Ahern
as 3:2010cv00465
Plaintiff:
Keenan G. Wilkins
Defendant:
Greg Ahern and Greg Ahern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Bell v. Alameda County Sheriff et al
as 3:2009cv03998
Plaintiff:
Eric W. Bell
Defendant:
Alameda County Sheriff and Greg Ahern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Qawi v. Ahern
as 3:2009cv02918
Petitioner:
Kanuri Surgury Qawi
Respondent:
Greg Ahern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Smith v. Greg Ahern, et al
as 09-15955
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY X. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
GREG AHERN, Sheriff, ROLEFSON, Judge, KINGSBURY, Judge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
