Cases 11 - 20 of 67
Montague et al v. Contemporary Services Corporation
as 1:2019cv06572
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Diaz, Ronnet Montague, Haywood Gerst and others
Defendant:
Contemporary Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Alexis et al v. Combe Incorporated
as 7:2019cv10358
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Tharpe, Samuel Young, James Minor and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haywood v. The County of Westchester et al
as 1:2019cv05621
Defendant:
Police Offier John Doe #2, John Doe #1, The County of Westchester and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Haywood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haywood v. Gearhart
as 6:2019cv06284
Plaintiff:
Donald Mark Haywood
Defendant:
Thomas Gearhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haywood v. Annucci et al
as 7:2018cv10913
Defendant:
Sgt. Michael Blot, Jr., Sgt. Robert A. Wahlquist, Anthony J. Annucci and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Haywood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv10497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Haywood v. State of New York et al
as 9:2018cv01097
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Sergeant Hart, State of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Haywood, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haywood v. State of New York et al
as 6:2018cv06640
Plaintiff:
Barry Haywood, Jr.
Defendant:
State of New York, John Doe #2, Commissioner of NYSDOCCS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maretta-Brooks v. Hanuszczak et al
as 5:2018cv00426
Defendant:
William Balduf, Unknown Police Officer, Kate Rosenthal and others
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Maretta-Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haywood v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2018cv01842
Plaintiff:
Barry Haywood, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe, Suffolk County Sheriff, County of Suffolk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
