Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
T.K. v. BARTLETT
as 1:2015cv00075
Plaintiff:
T.K.
Defendant:
HEIL BARTLETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WODARCZYK v. SANSOM STREET PRETZELS, INC. et al
as 5:2014cv04997
Plaintiff:
PETER WODARCZYK
Defendant:
SANSOM STREET PRETZELS, INC. , AN ORIGINAL SOFT PRETZEL FACTORY, INC. , NOLAN HEIL INVESTMENTS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
THE HEIL CO. v. BEAVER VALLEY TRUCK CENTER, INC.
as 2:2012cv01672
Plaintiff:
THE HEIL CO.
Defendant:
BEAVER VALLEY TRUCK CENTER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
TROUTMAN v. BARTLETT et al
as 1:2011cv00315
Plaintiff:
MAYHLON ROBERT TROUTMAN, JR.
Defendant:
HEIL BARTLETT and MARK DELUCA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
as 5:2008cv05421
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CARTER, III, WILLIAM A. CARTER, CHARLES H. CURRY and others
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Heil v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company
as 3:2008cv01918
Plaintiff:
Nancy Heil
Defendant:
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Heil v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company
as 3:2008cv01707
Plaintiff:
Nancy Heil
Defendant:
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
FRISON v. HEIL et al
as 2:2007cv02102
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY FRISON
Defendant:
LISA J HEIL, MICHAEL BUCCHIERI, M STEPHEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARDY v. BARNES et al
as 1:2007cv00106
Plaintiff:
HOLLY L. CARDY
Defendant:
STEVEN D. BARNES, ERIC R. HEIL, CHAD FINDLAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
