Cases 11 - 20 of 120
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., Automobile Club of Southern California, Darling Ingredients Inc and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company agent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center Inc, et al v. Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey, et al
as 22-1935
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DUAL DIAGNOSIS TREATMENT CENTER INC, DBA Sovereign Health of California, SHREYA HEALTH OF CALIFORNIA INC, MEDICAL CONCIERGE INC, DBA Medlink and others
Defendant / Appellee:
HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY and HORIZON HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC
JetBlue Airways Corporation et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
JetBlue Airways Corporation, JetBlue Airways Group Health Insurance Plan, Kraft Heinz Company, The and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly doing business as WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Flushing Radiation Oncology Services v. Horizon Healthcare Services, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02006
Plaintiff:
Flushing Radiation Oncology Services
Defendant:
Horizon Healthcare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Horizon Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 1:2022cv10493
Plaintiff:
Horizon Healthcare Services, Inc. doing business as Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey
Defendant:
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 2:2022cv00261
Defendant:
Highmark Inc doing business as Blueshield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as HealthNow New York Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Hoover, Sharon Zebley, Erick Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
MODERN ORTHOPAEDICS OF NEW JERSEY v. HORIZON HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2021cv20174
Plaintiff:
MODERN ORTHOPAEDICS OF NEW JERSEY
Defendant:
HORIZON HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. doing business as HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 1:2021cv09101
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, PREMERA and Premera Blue Cross, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 1:2021cv23448
Defendant:
Highmark, Inc. doing business as BlueShield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as HealthNow New York, Inc., Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Hoover, Sharon Zebley, Erick Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
