Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 157
Bailey v. Mack
as 1:2023cv00311
Petitioner: Thomas Justin Bailey
Respondent: Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoss CLC, LLC et al v. Underwriters at Loyd's, London
as 2:2023cv02644
Plaintiff: HOSS CLC, LLC and Cody Myers
Defendant: Syndicate 1886 and Underwriters at Loyd's, London
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Wilson v. Mack We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00207
Plaintiff: William D. Wilson, II
Defendant: Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOSS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12627
Plaintiff: JACOB HOSS
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James v. Mack
as 1:2023cv00204
Petitioner: Freddie Demetrius James
Respondent: Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HOSS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10825
Plaintiff: KELVIN HOSS
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hoss et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2023cv16355
Defendant: Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Kathy Hoss and Michael Hoss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hare et al v. McElroy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00438
Plaintiff: Yamil Hare, Jose Sosa and Yamil Alexsander Hare
Defendant: Stacy McElroy, Sheriff Huey Mack, Drug Enforcement Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HAMMOND v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17567
Plaintiff: HOSS HAMMOND
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Hoss
as 22-50635
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: D.J. Monroe Hoss

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?