Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Shafer v. Sheriff Department et al
as 5:2021cv00014
Defendant:
Assistant Commonwealth Attorney, Deputy Josh Cook, Sheriff Timothy C. Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Shafer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Houston v. Bolster et al
as 2:2019cv00552
Defendant:
Warden Bolster, SHU Supervisor, Chaplain Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Darien Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vaughan v. Winston et al
as 7:2018cv00405
Plaintiff:
Houston Lennie Vaughan
Defendant:
Lisa Ferguson and Gregory P. Winston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jaderborg v. Norris et al
as 1:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Jaderborg
Defendant:
Capt. Houston Norris, Mr. Mackey, B. Mead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Terry Robinson, et al
as 2:2016cv00219
Plaintiff:
Kim Hawkins
Defendant:
Suddath Relocation Systems of Houston, Inc. and Terry Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailey v. Obama et al
as 3:2016cv00223
Plaintiff:
Brent Scott Bailey
Defendant:
Barak Obama, Loretta Lynch, Attorney General, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teras BBC Houston (BVI) Ltd. v. TERAS Cargo Transport PTE, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00485
Plaintiff:
Teras BBC Houston (BVI) Ltd. and Wilmington Trust Company
Defendant:
TERAS Cargo Transport PTE, LLC and M/V Houston, IMO No. 9331593
Claimant:
Teras Breakbulk Ocean Navigation Enterprises LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Rankins v. Oxley et al
as 1:2015cv00496
Plaintiff:
Keith Allen Rankins
Defendant:
C. S. Oxley, Dwayne Williams and Houston Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
