Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Jordon v. Ebbert et al
as 4:2019cv01472
Defendant:
Mr. Watson, K. Sorce, D. Andrew Edringer and others
Plaintiff:
Bralen L. Jordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROGERS v. USP LEWISBURG et al
as 1:2019cv01380
Defendant:
C. Moore, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER J. Earp, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER B. Mississigan and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy N. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. USP LEWISBURG et al
as 2:2019cv03537
Defendant:
C. MOORE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER J. EARP, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER C. HURLEY and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMY N. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. County of Cumberland et al
as 1:2019cv01334
Defendant:
Lynn McKeever, RN, County of Cumberland, Robert Ritter and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Buebendorf et al
as 3:2019cv00626
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Gordon
Defendant:
SIS Buebendorf, Gemberling, Edinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HURLEY et al v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv05320
Plaintiff:
RENEE DOUGHERTY, MICHAEL WOOD, RANDY CURRIE and others
Defendant:
BAVARIAN MOTOR WORKS and BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
DELLENBAUGH v. THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2018cv01108
Defendant:
JEREMY HURLEY, JOHN DOE, THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DELLENBAUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HURLEY v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2018cv02175
Plaintiff:
RASHEEDA HURLEY
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HURLEY et al v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2018cv00879
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HURLEY and MELISSA RASMAN
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Warden et al
as 1:2017cv01204
Plaintiff:
Jamie R. Williams
Defendant:
Warden, Missingman, Lt. Seaba and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
