Cases 11 - 20 of 266
HUSTED v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY HUSTED
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HUSTED v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv23620
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HUSTED
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crutcher v. Barlow-Hust, et al.
as 23-1975
Petitioner / Appellant:
GWENDA LYNN CRUTCHER
Defendant / Appellee:
NOEL BARLOW-HUST, WARDEN, Warden
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF IDAHO and WARDEN WOODLAND
Finkle et al v. Greatbanc Trust Company et al
as 1:2023cv04732
Plaintiff:
Eric Finkle and Justin Whipple
Defendant:
Greatbanc Trust Company, Douglas Bosnik, Mark Husted and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Wu v. Davis et al
as 2:2023cv01362
Plaintiff:
Pak Keung Wu
Defendant:
Tracy Hope Davis and Kimberly J. Husted
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1595
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Husted v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00943
Plaintiff:
Ronald Husted
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Husted, Sr. v. Barnes & Noble Booksellers, Inc.
as 1:2023cv03650
Plaintiff:
Kevin Husted, Sr.
Defendant:
Barnes & Noble Booksellers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Williams v. Atencio, et al.
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell, Director Atencio, Director Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUSTED v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05018
Plaintiff:
VICTOR HUSTED
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
