Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Robert Peacher v. Paul Talbot, et al
as 20-2060
Defendant / Appellee:
J. ERNEST, PAUL A. TALBOT, Doctor, MICHAEL CONYERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT PEACHER
Holder v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv12509
Plaintiff:
J. Ernest Randolph Holder
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRIFFIN v. CARTER et al
as 1:2019cv00882
Defendant:
P. TALBOT, R. CARTER, J. ERNEST and others
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PORTUONDO v. PANALPINA, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv20159
Defendant:
ALEXANDER HOTZ, THAYNE WORSLEY, PANALPINA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ALAIN PORTUONDO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
PEACHER v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2018cv03044
Defendant:
M. LAFLOWER, J. DOE, P. TALBOT and others
Plaintiff:
R. PEACHER and ROBERT PEACHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ernest v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2018cv01100
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Nevada Department of Corrections, Offender Management Division and others
Plaintiff:
Howard J Ernest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS et al v. LEMMON et al
as 2:2015cv00408
Defendant:
DWAYNE ALSIP, LINDA S. ASHBY, DANIEL ATWOOD and others
Plaintiff:
LEONARD D. THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. LEMMON et al
as 2:2015cv00399
Defendant:
DWYANE ALSIP, DANIEL ARNOLD, LINDA ASHBY and others
Plaintiff:
LEONARD THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2015cv00849
Defendant:
DWYANE ALSIP, JEFF D. BALLENGER, DOUGLAS BARNES and others
Plaintiff:
LEONARD THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. City of Chicago Department of Law et al
as 1:2013cv04830
Defendant:
City of Chicago Department of Law and J. Ernest Mincy
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
