Cases 11 - 20 of 178
Hartfield et al v. Fisher
as 1:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Chezza Hartfield and Reggie McPhaul
Defendant:
Michael J. Fisher
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Hartfield et al v. Fisher
as 4:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
Chezza Hartfield, Reggie McPhaul and Keith Franklin
Defendant:
Michael J. Fisher
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Hartfield et al v. Fisher
as 4:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Chezza Hartfield and Reggie McPhaul
Defendant:
Michael J. Fisher
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
FISHER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv61601
Plaintiff:
JAMES J FISHER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander J. Fisher v. Riverside County Sheriffs Department Corrections Division et al
as 5:2021cv01684
Plaintiff:
Alexander J. Fisher
Defendant:
Riverside County Sheriffs Department Corrections Division, Officer Torres and Officer Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Covanta Holding Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv07980
Plaintiff:
Brian Jones
Defendant:
Covanta Holding Corporation, David M. Barse, Ronald J. Broglio and others
BUSHANSKY v. COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION, et al
as 2:2021cv17427
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BUSHANSKY
Defendant:
COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION,, DAVID M. BARSE, RONALD J. BROGLIO and others
WHITFIELD v. COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv04200
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION, SAMUEL ZELL, DAVID M BARSE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Ryan v. Covanta Holding Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01344
Plaintiff:
John Ryan
Defendant:
Covanta Holding Corporation, David M. Barse, Ronald J. Broglio and others
HALBERSTAM v. COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv17453
Plaintiff:
ADRIENNE HALBERSTAM
Defendant:
COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION,, DAVID M. BARSE, RONALD J. BROGLIO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
