Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Wade v. Alsup et al
as 3:2020mc80167
Defendant:
U.S. District Judge William H. Alsup, 9th Circuit Judge Johnnie B. Rawlinson, 9th Circuit Judge Richard R. Clifton and others
Plaintiff:
E.K. Wade
Wade v. Alsup et al
as 3:2020cv04489
Defendant:
Judge Richard R. Clifton, Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte, Judge Jon S. Tigar and others
Plaintiff:
E.K. Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wade v. Alsup et al
as 4:2019mc80084
Defendant:
Jon S. Tigar, Bobbie J. Montoya, Elizabeth D. Laporte and others
Plaintiff:
E. K. Wade
Wade v. Alsup et al
as 3:2018mc80229
Plaintiff:
E. K. Wade
Defendant:
Bobbie J. Montoya, Elizabeth D. Laporte, Johnnie B. Rawlinson and others
Wade v. Alsup et al
as 3:2018mc80210
Plaintiff:
E. K. Wade
Defendant:
Bobbie J. Montoya, Elizabeth D. Laporte, Johnnie B. Rawlinson and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00415
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Jackson, et al v. Los Lunas Community Program, et al
as 16-2172
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WALTER STEPHEN JACKSON, by his parents and next friends, Walter and Helen Jackson, STEVE NUNEZ, by his guardian and next friend, Mary Kathryn Reed, RON FULLER, by his mother and next friend, Josephine Boughton and others
Plaintiff Intervenor - Appellee:
JOHN E. YOUNG, IRIS YOUNG, legal guardians and paren of Rita Kay Young, DORA L. ROMERO and others
TCJ I, LLC v. RKM Flatline Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03702
Plaintiff:
TCJ I, LLC
Defendant:
RKM Flatline Inc., RKM Construction Co., Inc. and Richard J. Montoya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adrian Moon et al v. Kimberly Seibel et al
as 5:2016cv00009
Defendant:
H Aguliar, H Aguliar, Al B Allal and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Medina, Adrian Moon and Johnny Potter
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2233
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor - Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
