Cases 11 - 20 of 176
Tucker v. Mickle et al
as 1:2022cv04316
Plaintiff:
Marshall Tucker
Defendant:
Nelson Mickle, Medved and J. Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robertson v. Bernalillo County Detention Center
as 1:2022cv00667
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Robertson
Defendant:
Bernalillo County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Rommel Querol v. Richards, et al
as 22-16343
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROMMEL QUEROL
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARDS, C.O., A. SMITH, D. BELL and others
Todd Ashker v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 22-16162
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TODD LEWIS ASHKER
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, SCOTT KERNAN, GEORGE GIURBINO and others
Robertson v. Dale et al
as 1:2022cv02801
Plaintiff:
Dale J. Robertson
Defendant:
Conway Martin Dale and Martindale and Associates, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Querol v. Richards et al
as 1:2022cv01800
Plaintiff:
Rommel Querol
Defendant:
C/O Richards, A. Smith, D. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Tucker v. Ayers
as 1:2021cv05265
Plaintiff:
Marshall Tucker
Defendant:
A.A. Butch Ayers, Chief A.A. Butch Ayers, Officer J. Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Ashker v. Beard et al
as 1:2021cv01611
Plaintiff:
Todd Ashker
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Scott Kernan, George Giurbino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2021cv00834
Plaintiff:
French Mason and French Mason-Bey
Defendant:
William Hyatte, J Shoffner, A Miller and others
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only) and WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
