Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Williams v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2019cv00918
Defendant:
J. Wetzel, M. Yost and K. Kauffman
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2019cv00151
Defendant:
B. FLINCHBAUGH, DEP. SUPERINTENDENT M. CLARK, J. WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM J. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TALLEY v. CLARK et al
as 2:2019cv00253
Defendant:
UNKNOWN CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, MHM, SGT. BISSELL and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nieves v. State of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2018cv01253
Plaintiff:
Luis Nieves
Defendant:
State of Pennsylvania, Lackawanna County, County and State Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MEEKINS v. DOC's GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2018cv00851
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JAZZ MEEKINS
Defendant:
DOC's GRATERFORD, JOHN AND JANE DOE, J. HAWK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. John and Jane Does et al
as 4:2017cv00818
Plaintiff:
Patrick Davis
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, Internal Security Officers John and Jane Does, Internal Intelligence Officers John and Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATTIS v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2016cv00306
Plaintiff:
TREVOR MATTIS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, M. OVERMYER, GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosa-Diaz v. Harry et al
as 1:2016cv02303
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Rosa-Diaz
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Diana Woodside, Keri Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSA-DIAZ v. SGT. DOW et al
as 3:2014cv00005
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL ROSA-DIAZ
Defendant:
SGT. DOW, CO SHERIDAN, K. BEARJAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bieros v. Bickell et al
as 1:2013cv02767
Petitioner:
Roger Edward Jerome Bieros
Respondent:
T. Bickell, J. Wetzel, SCIH Property Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
