Cases 11 - 20 of 203
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Innace v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
as 1:2022cv03440
Plaintiff:
Debra Innace
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
M.W. et al v. New York City Department of Education
as 1:2022cv04653
Plaintiff:
M.W. and M.W. on behalf of her child J.C., a minor
Defendant:
New York City Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Rushing v. American Express et al
as 1:2021cv09803
Plaintiff:
Shaun Rushing
Defendant:
American Express, Visa, MasterCard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00469
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Monroe v. Rockland County Correctional Facility et al
as 7:2020cv06807
Defendant:
Rockland County Correctional Medical Department, Rockland County Correctional Facility, Captain J.C. Jiska and others
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Bergeron v. Hacker et al
as 1:2020cv02782
Respondent:
J. Britt Johnson, Thomas W. Thrash, Ennumerous Unknown Agents of Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Petitioner:
Jacob A. Bergeron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
