Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Kerce et al v. J.R. Jones Fixture Co.
as 0:2016cv04032
Plaintiff:
Cliff Kerce , William Grimm and Plasterers and Cabinet Makers Health Fund, the
Defendant:
J.R. Jones Fixture Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. J.R. Jones Fixture Co.
as 1:2015cv03363
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Supplemental Retirement Fund , Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
J.R. Jones Fixture Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Fairview Health Services v. J.R. Jones Fixture Company et al
as 0:2013cv02859
Plaintiff:
Fairview Health Services
Defendant:
J.R. Jones Fixture Company and UMR, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Raines et al v. J.R. Jones Fixture Co. et al
as 0:2012cv02129
Plaintiff:
John Raines and Tim McGough
Defendant:
J.R. Jones Fixture Co. and Douglas J. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
William Rupert, et al v. Anthony Carver, et al
as 11-15867
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM RUPERT and CAROL SLATER, as individuals and as successors in interest to Ronald E. Bushnell, deceased
Defendant:
BARBARA J.R. JONES, MARK B. SIMONS, LINDA M. GEMELLO and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY CARVER, JEAN HUTCHINS, MARIA DUNN, individually and in their official capacities as employees or agents of the County of Mendocino and others
Rupert et al v. Jones et al
as 5:2010cv00721
Plaintiff:
William Rupert and Carol Slater
Defendant:
Barbara J.R. Jones, Mark B. Simons, Linda M. Gemello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rupert et al v. Jones et al
as 3:2010cv00721
Plaintiff:
William Rupert and Carol Slater
Defendant:
Barbara J.R. Jones , Richard J Henderson, Yvonne Busch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
