Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Lin v. La Vie en Szechuan Restaurant Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv09507
Plaintiff:
Yunjian Lin
Defendant:
La Vie en Szechuan Restaurant Corp., Yi Zhang and John Wang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wang v. SAFECO Insurance Company of America
as 5:2014cv04098
Plaintiff:
John Wang
Defendant:
SAFECO Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Christopher Brophy, et al v. Jiangbo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
as 14-10213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BROPHY and TARA LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JIANGBO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JIN LINXIAN, ELSA SUNG and others
:
SERVICE
Frawley v. Putnam Hospital Center et al
as 7:2012cv03374
Plaintiff:
Donna Frawley
Defendant:
Putnam Hospital Center, Raymond Yun, MD, County of Putnam and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dewayne Shelton v. Michael Lemons, et al
as 11-20670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEWAYNE SHELTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL LEMONS, Sergeant, BRENDA HOUGH, JOHN WANG and others
Lagace v. Jiangbo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv22556
Plaintiff:
Philippe Lagace
Defendant:
Jiangbo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Jin Linxian, Elsa Sung and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0022
Shelton v. Lemons et al
as 4:2010cv00452
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Shelton
Defendant:
Michael Lemons, Brenda J Hough, John Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vohra Health Services, P.A. v. Wang
as 1:2009cv22407
Plaintiff:
Vohra Health Services, P.A.
Defendant:
John Wang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
David Crook v. Autodesk et al
as 2:2009cv03386
Plaintiff:
David Crook
Defendant:
Autodesk, Autodesk Canada, Inc., Autodesk, GmbH and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Sarfraz et al v. Vohra Health Services, PA
as 2:2009cv00168
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Sarfraz, Muhammed K. Qadri and John Wang
Defendant:
Vohra Health Services, PA
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
