Cases 11 - 20 of 166
McCurry et al v. Wright (TV2)
as 2:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Etha Jones and Agness McCurry
Defendant:
Senior Judge Thomas Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Norman v. Higgins et al
as 3:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Norman
Defendant:
Judge William Higgins and Judge Monte Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Officer of the Desoto County, Mississippi Chancery Court et al
as 2:2023cv02027
Plaintiff:
Greg Brown
Defendant:
Officer of the Desoto County, Mississippi Chancery Court, Judge Mitchell M. Lundy, Misty Heffner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCurry et al v. Wright (TV1)
as 3:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Agness McCurry and Etha Jones
Defendant:
Senior Judge Thomas Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watzke v. Watzke et al
as 3:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Nicholas J. Watzke
Defendant:
Charles A. Watzke, Renee Kopie, Joe Biden and others
Goff v. Morgan et al
as 1:2022cv01190
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Goff
Defendant:
Judge Roy B. Morgan, Jr., Bradley Champine and Jeremy B. Epperson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Coffee
as 2:2022cv02613
Petitioner:
Terrance Williams
Respondent:
Judge Lee V. Coffee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
W. v. Shelby County et al
as 2:2022cv02496
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Michelle W.
Defendant:
Shelby County, Judge Dan H. Michael and Shelby County Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Brown v. Judge Bennett et al
as 3:2022cv00468
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Henry Brown
Defendant:
Judge Bennett and Judge Eischeid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGuire v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Cassandra McGuire
Defendant:
State of Tennessee and Judge Allen Kern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
