Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company v. Jakks Pacific, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00146
Plaintiff:
Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company
Defendant:
JAKKS Pacific, Inc. , JAKKS Sales Corporation and Maui, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company v. Jakks Pacific, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05231
Plaintiff:
Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company
Defendant:
JAKKS Sales Corporation, Jakks Pacific, Inc. and Maui, Inc.
The Vladimir Gusinsky Living Trust v. Stephen Berman et al
as 2:2015cv02027
Defendant:
Dan Almagor, Stephen Berman, Leigh Anne Brodsky and others
Plaintiff:
The Vladimir Gusinsky Living Trust
Spin Master, LTD et al v. Jakks Pacific, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00188
Plaintiff:
Spin Master, LTD , Leonard R. Clark and H. Peter Greene Jr.
Defendant:
Jakks Pacific, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Original Appalachian Artworks, Inc. v. JAKKS Pacific, Inc.
as 1:2014cv02861
Plaintiff:
Original Appalachian Artworks, Inc.
Defendant:
JAKKS Pacific, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Lousiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. Stephen Berman et al
as 2:2014cv01670
Defendant:
Dan Almagor, Joel Bennett, Stephen Berman and others
Plaintiff:
Lousiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System
Advanced Advisors G. P. v. Stephen Berman et al
as 2:2014cv01420
Plaintiff:
Advanced Advisors G. P.
Defendant:
Dan Almagor, Joel Bennett, Stephen Berman and others
Yagoozon, Inc. v. Jakks Pacific, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00775
Plaintiff:
Yagoozon, Inc.
Defendant:
Jakks Pacific, Inc. and Disguise, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andrew Dylewicz v. JAKKS Pacific Inc et al
as 2:2013cv05487
Defendant:
Joel M Bennett, Stephen G Berman and JAKKS Pacific Inc
Plaintiff:
Andrew Dylewicz
John Melot v. JAKKS Pacific Inc et al
as 2:2013cv05388
Defendant:
Joel M Bennett, Stephen G Berman and JAKKS Pacific Inc
Plaintiff:
John Melot
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
