Cases 11 - 20 of 4,349
Simmons v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv11454
Petitioner:
Latausha Simmons
Respondent:
Raphael Washington, Kim Worthy, James White and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Copas et al v. Sackett et al
as 1:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
James M. Copas, Daniel J. Hartman, Rodney Halcomb and others
Defendant:
Kelly Sackett and Kalamazoo County Republican Committee, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10899
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Bristow v. NRE 1, LLC
as 2:2024cv11398
Plaintiff:
Mr. Kyle James Bristow
Defendant:
NRE 1, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Columbia Casualty Company v. MPMS St. James Acquisition, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv11376
Plaintiff:
Columbia Casualty Company
Defendant:
MPMS St. James Acquisition, LLC, Mission Point Management Services, LLC and St. James Nursing & Physical Rehabilitation Center Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Hartwig et al v. Clinton, Charter Township of et al
as 2:2024cv11357
Plaintiff:
Thomas G. Hartwig and Donna L. Hartwig
Defendant:
Clinton, Charter Township of, Robert Cannon, James H. Elrod and others
Lemson et al v. Newaygo Public Schools et al
as 1:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
W.L. and Robert Lemson
Defendant:
Newaygo Public Schools, Ben Gilpin, James Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Heflin #483317 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Jermaine D. Heflin #483317
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi E. Washington, Jeremy Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
