Cases 11 - 20 of 3,428
Carroll v. Carroll et al
as 1:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Joseph Walker Carroll
Defendant:
James E. Carroll, Sgt. Gibson, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. USA
as 3:2024cv00051
Petitioner:
Nicholas James Hall
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
JAMES v. WARDEN
as 5:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Calvin James
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sneed et al v. AutoZone Parts, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
James Sneed and Jennifer Sneed
Defendant:
AutoZone Parts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Beane v. Allegheny Wood Products, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
James Beane
Defendant:
Allegheny Wood Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Martin et al v. Shelby Transport, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Stacey Lynne Martin and Daniel Joe Martin
Defendant:
Shelby Transport, Inc. and James Roy Frantz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC v. Parsons et al
as 2:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC
Defendant:
James A. Parsons and Audra R. Pritt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Schubert v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Allan Schubert
Defendant:
M. Gonzales, S. Thorne, R. D. Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mey v. Pintas et al
as 5:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Diana Mey
Defendant:
William Pintas, P&M Law Firm, LLC, P&M Law Firm (PR), LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
