Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07179
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Doe v. Carhartt, Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv14261
Defendant:
Jennifer Piscopink, Jodi Ruffini, Andrea Dudek and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Norris v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2026cv07209
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Turner et al v. Zale Delaware, Inc.
as 4:2026cv13397
Plaintiff:
Sandra Smith and Jennifer E. Turner
Defendant:
Zale Delaware, Inc. doing business as d/b/a Zales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Durning v. LOreal USA S/D, Inc.
as 3:2026cv13347
Defendant:
LOreal USA S/D, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Durning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
v. Town of Hope Mills, North Carolina et al
as 4:2026cv00247
Defendant:
Jennifer H Locklear and Town of Hope Mills, North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Locklear v. Town of Hope Mills
as 4:2026cv00248
Defendant:
Town of Hope Mills
Plaintiff:
Jennifer H Locklear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Noble v. Banks et al
as 2:2026cv01625
Defendant:
Corby Free, Jennifer Haywood, Alford Harvester Marcus and others
Plaintiff:
John-Martin Noble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv03381
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Feldman et al v. FCA US, LLC
as 1:2026cv01430
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Plaintiff:
Sean Scherer, Rodny Helal, Jan Erickson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
