Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Cleveland v. Adger et al
as 4:2017cv02112
Petitioner:
George Cleveland, III
Respondent:
Jerry B Adger and State of South Carolina, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cleveland v. Adger et al
as 8:2017mc00310
Petitioner:
George Cleveland, III
Respondent:
Jerry B Adger and State of South Carolina, The
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
Hunt v. Adger et al
as 2:2017cv01785
Plaintiff:
Leslie Hunt
Defendant:
Jerry B Adger, M Hirniak, K Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Adger et al
as 2:2017cv01619
Plaintiff:
Leslie C Hunt, Jr
Defendant:
Jerry B Adger, M Hirniak, Sgt Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penland v. Cavannough et al
as 7:2017cv00084
Plaintiff:
Eddie L Penland
Defendant:
Jerry B Adger, Erin Johnson and Alan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv01617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Tinsley v. South Carolina Department of Probation Parole and Pardon Services et al
as 2:2016cv00996
Plaintiff:
James Tinsley
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Probation Parole and Pardon Services, Nikki Haley, Larry Ray Patton, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Stirling et al
as 5:2016cv00587
Plaintiff:
Christopher Greene, III
Defendant:
Bryan P Stirling, Jerry B Adger, Cecilia Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tice v. Adger et al
as 3:2015cv04781
Plaintiff:
Joseph Charles Tice
Defendant:
Jerry B Adger and Lisa Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meggett v. South Carolina Department of Probation Pardon and Parole Services et al
as 6:2015cv04101
Plaintiff:
Darian A Meggett
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Probation Pardon and Parole Services , Jerry B Adger , John/Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
