Cases 11 - 20 of 335
BROOKS v. SOCLEAN INC
as 2:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
JESSIE JUDSON BROOKS, SR
Defendant:
SoClean Inc and SOCLEAN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CRAWLEY v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2022cv00106
Petitioner:
JESSIE CRAWLEY
Respondent:
ERIC ARMEL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PAULK v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV et al
as 2:2021cv01802
Plaintiff:
JESSIE PAULK
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V, PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS HOLDING USA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STONE v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01087
Defendant:
"XYZ CORP", MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., "JANE DOE" and others
Plaintiff:
JESSIE STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stevens v. Sullum et al
as 3:2020cv01911
Defendant:
A.D.A. Judy Price, Jessi Sullum, Detective Chris Kolcharno and others
Plaintiff:
John Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hagenbaugh et al v. Nissan North America et al
as 3:2020cv01838
Plaintiff:
Marianne P. Lubrecht, Frederick L. Lubrecht, Sherri A. Homanko and others
Defendant:
Jessie W. Armstead, Antonio D. Pierce, Hyundai Motor Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JESSIE v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2020cv04874
Plaintiff:
SHANNON JESSIE
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
LABORERS' COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA v. JESSIE MAE CONSTRUCTION LLC et al
as 2:2020cv01407
Plaintiff:
LABORERS' COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
EDWIN J. PEOPLES and JESSIE MAE CONSTRUCTION LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitaker et al v. SCI Camp Hill Correction
as 1:2020cv00117
Defendant:
SCI Camp Hill Correction
Plaintiff:
Jessie Hernandez and Damion Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
