Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Dydzak v. United States of America et al
as 4:2017cv04360
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Dydzak
Defendant:
United States of America, Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, Matthew C. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Tripp v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2017cv01050
Petitioner:
Justin Lee Tripp
Respondent:
Joe Lombardo, Adam Laxalt, Jess Matsuda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perales v. Boehner et al
as 2:2012cv00456
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
John Boehner, James E Clyburn, David R Obey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brekke v. Coughenour et al
as 2:2011cv01485
Petitioner:
Ronald L. Brekke
Respondent:
John C Coughenour, Kevin Key, Jenny A Durkan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Holmes-James v. Honorable John C. Coughenour et al
as 2:2010cv01944
Plaintiff:
Geneva Holmes-James
Defendant:
John C Coughenour and Mrs. Lenz/Torie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Dickerson v. United States District Court et al
as 2:2010cv00833
Plaintiff:
Bobby L. Dickerson, Jr.
Defendant:
United States District Court, Mary Alice Theiler, John C Coughenour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCGUIRE v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT et al
as 1:2010cv00696
Plaintiff:
JOHN PATRICK MCGUIRE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MONTANA, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corrigan v. Pechman et al
as 2:2010cv00001
Plaintiff:
John L Corrigan
Defendant:
Marsha J Pechman, Ricardo S Martinez, John C Coughenour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILLER et al v. HEINEMAN et al
as 1:2009cv00578
Plaintiff:
CHARLES C. MILLER, HAROLD EDMUND STONIER and DALE SCOTT HEINEMAN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL MUKASEY, HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
