Cases 11 - 20 of 24
HACHMEISTER v. DOE(S) 1-5
as 1:2019cv03783
Plaintiff:
BRAYDEN HACHMEISTER
Defendant:
JOHN DOE(S) 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIRIG v. GEO/NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2017cv00070
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, JANE DOE(S), JOHN DOE(S) and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER J. DIRIG, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Affinity Mutual Insurance Company v. SCI Alarm Inc et al
as 3:2016cv00066
Plaintiff:
Affinity Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
SCI Alarm Inc , Koorsen Fire & Security Inc, John Doe(s) 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALKER-RILEY v. DENSON et al
as 1:2014cv00332
Defendant:
TERRANCE DENSON and JOHN DOE(S)
Plaintiff:
KERRIE J. WALKER-RILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
PORTEE et al v. CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION et al
as 1:2013cv01582
Defendant:
CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION, JOHN DOE, JOHN DOE(S) and others
Plaintiff:
HASKELL DANIEL PORTEE and PAMELA PORTEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Holley v. Fort Wayne City of Police Department et al
as 1:2011cv00313
Plaintiff:
Bradley D Holley
Defendant:
Fort Wayne City of Police Department , Johnnie Moreno , J Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Frohwerk v. Lemmon et al
as 2:2011cv00221
Plaintiff:
David Frohwerk
Defendant:
Bruce Lemmon, Edwin G Buss, Mark Levenhagen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUSPON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2011cv00109
Defendant:
EDWIN G. BUSS, JANE DOE(S), JOHN DOE(S) and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. HUSPON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PAUL v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2010cv00180
Defendant:
CHURCH, JOHN DOE(S), JOHN EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY WILLIAM PAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
