Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kerr et al v. Jones et al
as 1:2015cv00120
Petitioner:
George Conrad Kerr and Melody Faye Kerr
Respondent:
Blair Jones, Erika R. Peterman, Rochelle Loyning and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Winne v. Knight et al
as 6:2015cv00044
Plaintiff:
Michael Winne
Defendant:
Josh Knight, Sargent Weber and Candice Neubaur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guille v. Sweeney et al
as 6:2014cv00051
Plaintiff:
Adrian Guille
Defendant:
Josh Sweeney, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox et al v. Curry et al
as 9:2013cv00089
Plaintiff:
Crystal L. Cox and John and Jane Does 1-5
Defendant:
Scott Curry, TLC Engineering, PE, LLC, Teresa L. Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Cox et al v. Curry et al
as 6:2013cv00028
Plaintiff:
Crystal L. Cox and John and Jane Does 1-5
Defendant:
Scott Curry, TLC Engineering, PE, LLC, Teresa L. Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Fiechtner v. Highland Park Apts.
as 9:2011cv00016
Plaintiff:
Charles Adam Fiechtner, Sr
Defendant:
Highland Park Apts., Trevor Hill, Josh Burrows and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dewitz v. Law et al
as 9:2010cv00023
Petitioner:
Josh Dewitz
Respondent:
Sam Law and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pegg v. Lewistown Police Department et al
as 4:2008cv00087
Plaintiff:
Gary Pegg
Defendant:
Lewistown Police Department, Stacey Danzer, Rickie D. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
