Cases 11 - 20 of 39
King v. Salmonson
as 9:2018cv00027
Respondent:
James Salmonson
Petitioner:
Christopher King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Podry et al
as 6:2018cv00024
Petitioner:
Ethan Podry, James Colburn, William Houston Parry and others
Respondent:
Michael Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King v. Green et al
as 9:2017cv00177
Petitioner:
Justin King
Respondent:
Tom Green and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King v. LSF9 Master Participation Trust
as 9:2017cv00172
Plaintiff:
David P. King , Jr.
Defendant:
LSF9 Master Participation Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
McCaul v. First Montana Bank et al
as 2:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
Dan Patrick McCaul
Defendant:
First Montana Bank, Chris DuToit, Joe Kesler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Warden Fender et al
as 4:2017cv00061
Petitioner:
Nathan King
Respondent:
Warden Fender and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Poulson et al v. City of Billings et al
as 1:2017cv00017
Plaintiff:
Kermit Ty Poulson, The People, Laurie Williams and others
Defendant:
City of Billings, Burger King, Tina Volek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Gruber #204
as 9:2017cv00015
Plaintiff:
Justin King
Defendant:
Gruber #204
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BITTERROOT RIDGE RUNNERS SNOWMOBILE CLUB et al v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE et al
as 9:2016cv00158
Plaintiff:
BITTERROOT RIDGE RUNNERS SNOWMOBILE CLUB , RAVALLI COUNTY OFF-ROAD USER ASSOCIATION , BITTERROOT BACKCOUNTRY CYCLISTS and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE , U.S. FOREST SERVICE, Northern Region , BITTERROOT NATIONAL FOREST and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Rohrbach et al v. Schmid et al
as 9:2016cv00096
Plaintiff:
Fred Rohrbach and Bitterroot LLC
Defendant:
David E. Schmid, United States Forest Service and Julie K. King
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
