Cases 11 - 20 of 677
Tennessee, State of et al v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
as 2:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Tennessee, State of, Arkansas, State of, Alabama, State of and others
Defendant:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Bryant (ID 7323) v. Wichita Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv03055
Plaintiff:
Craig M. Bryant
Defendant:
Wichita Police Department, Kansas, State of, Paul O'Mara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv04024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Manning (ID 68174) v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2024cv03025
Petitioner:
Fayvun Manning
Respondent:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dean v. Dean, et al.
as 5:2024cv04008
Plaintiff:
Brittany Elizabeth Dean, Brittany Ecton and Brittany Sciara
Defendant:
Dana Dean, Dan Dean, Kansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Waters v. Naylor
as 5:2024cv03012
Plaintiff:
Randall S. Waters
Defendant:
Kansas, State of and Robert D. Naylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2024cv03037
Plaintiff:
Pierre Quaran Hamilton
Defendant:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Suggs v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2024cv03006
Plaintiff:
Mardi Terome Suggs
Defendant:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Geist v. Kansas State University Foundation, et al
as 23-3266
Plaintiff:
FORREST L. GEIST
Defendant:
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION, KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY, NETWORK KANSAS and others
Kansas, State of, ex rel., Kris W. Kobach, Attorney General v. Macquarie Energy LLC
as 5:2023cv04116
Plaintiff:
Kansas, State of
Defendant:
Macquarie Energy LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
