Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Hill v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00449
Petitioner:
Melvin R. Hill
Defendant:
Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rush v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00368
Petitioner:
Terrance Rush
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Welch v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00347
Petitioner:
Sean W. Welch
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wade v. Heckard
as 3:2023cv00101
Petitioner:
John Charles Wade, III
Respondent:
Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Parks v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00298
Petitioner:
Maurice Montrae Parks
Respondent:
Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Patrick v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00234
Petitioner:
Steven Randall Patrick
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Patrick v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00232
Petitioner:
Steven Randall Patrick
Defendant:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sproles v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00223
Petitioner:
Michael William Sproles
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
King v. The City of Huntington, WV et al
as 3:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
Katina Von Newman King
Defendant:
The City of Huntington, WV, The Huntington Police Dept., all affiliated programs, churches, charities, foundations, orgs. of above and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scheiblich v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00156
Petitioner:
Dillon J. Scheiblich
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
