Cases 11 - 20 of 73
Evenstad et al v. Schnell et al
as 0:2020cv00885
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Karen Robinson, Michelle Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Braun and Thomas Evenstad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evenstad v. Schnell et al
as 0:2020cv00864
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Deneen Clemons, Karen Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Evenstad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Government Employees Insurance Company v. Knutson et al
as 0:2020cv00503
Defendant:
Christina Marie Knutson, Jason Tomporowski, Dana Mayo and others
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Braun v. Walz et al
as 0:2020cv00333
Defendant:
Chris Pawelk, Commission of Corrections, Tim Walz and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Christopher Braun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mortensen v. Hoppe et al
as 0:2019cv02928
Defendant:
Steven Hoppe, Timothy Knutson and Kelly Wood
Plaintiff:
Bryan G. Mortensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Potter et al
as 0:2019cv02746
Defendant:
Lt David Spets, Nate Knutson, Eric Hennen and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph T. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2019cv01864
Defendant:
K. Knutson, State of Minnesota, N. Pelosi and others
Plaintiff:
Howard G Jackson and Howard G. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Udoh v. Knutson
as 0:2019cv01311
Petitioner:
Emem Ufot Udoh
Respondent:
Nate Knutson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mayo et al v. Knutson et al
as 0:2019cv00788
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company, Neil Owen Knutson and Christina Marie Knutson
Plaintiff:
Dana Mayo and Melissa Amandalee Mayo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tomporowski v. Knutson et al
as 0:2019cv00774
Defendant:
Neil Owen Knutson, Government Employees Insurance Company and Christina Marie Knutson
Plaintiff:
Jason Tomporowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
