Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Scott v. Corrections Corp of America et al
as 1:2014cv00956
Plaintiff:
Robert E Scott
Defendant:
Corrections Corp of America, Tim Keith, James M LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Morgan v. Winn Correctional Center, et al
as 14-30101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN MORGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
WINN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, DOCTOR KUPLESKY, KIEFFER and others
Derek Harris v. Stephen Kuplesky, et al
as 14-30093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK D. HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN KUPLESKY, DOCTOR WHEAT, TIMOTHY KEITH and others
Frazier v. Keith et al
as 1:2013cv03110
Plaintiff:
Claude R Frazier
Defendant:
Timothy Keith, Singleton, Daniel Mars and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Winn Correctional Center et al
as 1:2013cv01987
Plaintiff:
Kevin Morgan
Defendant:
Winn Correctional Center, Doctor Kuplesky, Kieffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Stapleton v. Correction Corp. of America, et al
as 13-30388
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LYNN STAPLETON
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION CORPORATION OF AMERICA, TIM KEITH, NICOLE WALKER and others
Harris v. Kuplesky et al
as 1:2013cv00598
Plaintiff:
Derek D Harris
Defendant:
Stephen Kuplesky, Wheat, Timothy Keith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Veal v. Kuplesky et al
as 1:2013cv00566
Plaintiff:
James Veal
Defendant:
Stephen Kuplesky, Timothy Keith, Mark Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobbins v. Keith et al
as 1:2012cv03046
Plaintiff:
Michael Dobbins
Defendant:
Tim Keith, Nicole Walker, James LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Augustine v. Keith et al
as 1:2012cv02621
Plaintiff:
Joseph Augustine
Defendant:
Timothy Keith, Stephen Kuplesky, Cunnigham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
