Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Negron v. Gelb
as 1:2014cv12227
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Negron
Defendant:
Bruce Gelb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nuby v. Lopez et al
as 1:2014cv20993
Plaintiff:
Juanita Nuby
Defendant:
Edwin Lopez, P. Carabeo, P.A., Delvena Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Orengo-Echevarria et al v. Walmart Puerto Rico, Inc.
as 3:2013cv01433
Plaintiff:
Maribel Orengo-Echevarria , Angel L. Negron-Marty and Conjugal Partnership Negron-Orengo
Defendant:
Walmart Puerto Rico, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
James Hairston v. Ivan Negron, et al
as 13-10474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. HAIRSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
IVAN L. NEGRON, M.D., UNKNOWN UTILIZATION REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMBERS 1 AND 2, GILBERT MICHEL, M.L.P. and others
Negron v. Gelb
as 1:2013cv10128
Petitioner:
Jose L. Negron
Respondent:
Bruce I. Gelb and Souza Baranowski Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Negron-Torres v Verizon Corporate Services Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01807
Plaintiff:
Ivis L. Negron-Torres and HSN
Defendant:
Verizon Corporate Services Group, Inc., ABC Corporation and XYZ Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ronald Menard v. USA, et al
as 12-10683
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD MENARD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PASCO REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LEESBURG REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
NEGRON et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2011cv05651
Plaintiff:
JOSE L. NEGRON and MARIA NEGRON
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Concepcion v. Tidwell et al
as 5:2011cv00492
Plaintiff:
Manuel Concepcion
Defendant:
Mark Tidwell, I. L. Negron, S. Nikbakht and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Negron et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as 6:2011cv01127
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Negron and Maria Negron
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
