Cases 11 - 20 of 64
WILLIAMS v. PRATT et al
as 3:2020cv10269
Defendant:
SHEREEF M. ELNAHAL, C. WILLAIMS, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DONNELL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERALES et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv01373
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THADDIUS L LINDSEY and MELINDA PERALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Macio Lindsey, Jr. v. R. Johnson
as 19-55786
Petitioner / Appellant:
MACIO L. LINDSEY, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
R. C. JOHNSON, Warden
LINDSEY v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv00444
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and MERCK & CO. INC.
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA L. LINDSEY
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COVAS et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv02072
Plaintiff:
VALERIE L. LINDSEY, MICHAEL V. LUJAN, ANNETTE MCMILLAN and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Covas et al v. Bristol Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2018cv01248
Plaintiff:
Valerie L. Lindsey, Michael V. Lujan, Annette McMillan and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. and Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lindsey v. Tait
as 2:2018cv01812
Plaintiff:
Arthur L. Lindsey
Defendant:
Tait
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsey v. Tait
as 1:2018cv00878
Plaintiff:
Arthur L. Lindsey
Defendant:
Tait
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsey v. Colvin et al
as 3:2018cv00048
Plaintiff:
Sierra L. Lindsey
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
