Cases 11 - 20 of 23
McGee v. North Carolina State Bar, et al
as 5:2012cv00227
Plaintiff:
Michael H. McGee
Defendant:
North Carolina State Bar , State of North Carolina, L. Thomas Lunsford, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. North Carolina Dept. of Health and Human Services, Division of Social Services, Child Support Enforcement Section
as 5:2012cv00016
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Thomas
Defendant:
North Carolina Dept. of Health and Human Services, Division of Social Services, Child Support Enforcement Section
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Thomas v. Correa
as 5:2011cv00715
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Thomas
Defendant:
Aida Correa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
THOMAS v. VANN YORK HIGH POINT NISSAM et al
as 1:2011cv00743
Plaintiff:
HATTIE L. THOMAS
Defendant:
VANN YORK HIGH POINT NISSAN, YVONNE STRONG, TREY POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THOMAS v. SANTANDER CONSUMER USA
as 1:2011cv00605
Plaintiff:
HATTIE L. THOMAS
Defendant:
SANTANDER CONSUMER USA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
THOMAS v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
as 1:2011cv00606
Plaintiff:
HATTIE L. THOMAS
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Thomas v. The Hamlin Companies, Inc.
as 4:2011cv00121
Plaintiff:
Cynthia L Thomas
Defendant:
The Hamlin Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Midland Funding LLC et al v. Thomas
as 5:2011cv00292
Plaintiff:
Midland Funding LLC and Robert J. Bernhardt
Defendant:
Randy L. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SATTERFIELD v. MILLER et al
as 1:2008cv00874
Plaintiff:
BILLY G. SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
EDGAR MILLER, L. THOMAS LUNSFORD, II and TOM KEITH
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thomas v. Olshausen et al
as 3:2007cv00130
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Thomas
Defendant:
Ynez Olshausen, Mary Ellen McDonald, Peter Gorman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
