Cases 11 - 20 of 35
HERZ v. CONGREGATION BETH-EL ZEDECK et al
as 1:2019cv04810
Defendant:
JOE HOGSETT, ETZ CHAIM SEPHARDIC CONGREGATION, JUDGE MARC ROTHENBERG and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
HERZ v. HAMILTON et al
as 1:2019cv03999
Defendant:
JENNIFER WALTHALL, DENNIS SASSO, RICHARD L. YOUNG and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
YOUNG v. KNOX COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER
as 2:2019cv00275
Plaintiff:
MARION L. YOUNG
Defendant:
KNOX COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERZ v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2019cv01661
Defendant:
DAVID KENNEDY, MONROE CIRCUIT COURT, MICHAEL CASTELLARIN and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HERZ v. MAGNUS-STINSON et al
as 1:2019cv00806
Defendant:
ORA HIRSCH PESCOVITZ, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HERZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv00023
Defendant:
P. FREDERICK PFENNINGER, BERNARD PYLITT, DENNIS SASSO and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HERZ v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2018cv03447
Defendant:
P. FREDERICK PFENNINGER, JUDGE MARC ROTHENBERG, BERNARD PYLITT and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HERZ v. SASSO et al
as 1:2018cv02817
Defendant:
RICHARD L. YOUNG, MITCH MCCONNELL, SEAN PERSIN and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HERZ v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2018cv00347
Defendant:
EVAN BAYH, LAURA BINFORD, BOSE MCKINNEY & EVANS LLP and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
