Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Albert Mills v. Maryland Department of Public Safety
as 21-7240
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT CURTIS MILLS
Defendant / Appellee:
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION, LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, Governor and others
Mills v. Hogan et al
as 1:2020cv03767
Defendant:
Officer Dorcan, Robin Woolford, Lt. Sawyers and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Saqib Ali v. Lawrence Hogan, Jr.
as 20-2266
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAQIB ALI
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN E. FROSH and LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, JR.
Davis v. Hogan et al
as 1:2020cv01892
Defendant:
Lawrence J. Hogan, Jr., Boyd K. Rutherford, Warden Walter West and others
Plaintiff:
Willie L. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Daniel Hine, III et al v. State of Maryland, et al.
as 1:2020cv01285
Plaintiff:
Cocobuns Tanning Inc. and Daniel Hine, III
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND, Robert J. Neall, Michael T. Pedone and others
Maryland Green Party et al v. Hogan et al
as 1:2020cv01253
Plaintiff:
Steven Andrew Ellis, Maryland Green Party, Libertarian Party of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Lawrence J. Hogan, Jr. and Linda H Lamone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neale v. Hogan et al
as 1:2020cv01219
Defendant:
Robert L. Greene, Walter Holmes, Boyd K. Rutherford and others
Plaintiff:
Kindall Neale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Vaeth v. The State Of Maryland et al
as 1:2020cv01228
Plaintiff:
Brian Charles Vaeth
Defendant:
The State Of Maryland and Lawrence J. Hogan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv
Wooten, III v. Hogan et al
as 1:2020cv01218
Plaintiff:
Edsel Wooten, III
Defendant:
Robert L Greene, Boyd K. Rutherford, Walter Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01196
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
