Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Progressive Mountain Insurance Company v. Ledesma et al
as 1:2026cv04469
Plaintiff:
Progressive Mountain Insurance Company
Defendant:
Eustolia Monroy Ledesma, Edvin Chun Ajanel, Wilmer Alonso Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Ledesma v. Pasadena Police Department et al
as 4:2026cv06490
Plaintiff:
James Ledesma
Defendant:
Pasadena Police Department, Monique Cumpian and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Singletary, II. (David Singletary)
as 26-2018
Defendant:
DWIGHT A SINGLETARY, II, MCKENZIE MERRIALICE COLES, NEHEMIAH FANE and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02392
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv24991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Ledesma v. Advanced Surgical Technologies, Inc
as 0:2026cv61991
Plaintiff:
Pascal Ledesma
Defendant:
Advanced Surgical Technologies, Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gonzalez Perez, et al. v. Blanche
as 26-4470
Petitioner:
MARIA GUADALUPE GONZALEZ PEREZ, MARCOS LEDESMA GONZALEZ and FERNANDO LEDESMA GONZALEZ
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Stimpson v. Ledesma et al
as 3:2026cv01903
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Stimpson
Defendant:
Jacobo Ledesma, III and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
