Cases 1 - 10 of 100
United States of America v. Singletary, II. (David Singletary)
as 26-2018
Defendant:
DWIGHT A SINGLETARY, II, MCKENZIE MERRIALICE COLES, NEHEMIAH FANE and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02392
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv24991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Ledesma v. Advanced Surgical Technologies, Inc
as 0:2026cv61991
Plaintiff:
Pascal Ledesma
Defendant:
Advanced Surgical Technologies, Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gonzalez Perez, et al. v. Blanche
as 26-4470
Petitioner:
MARIA GUADALUPE GONZALEZ PEREZ, MARCOS LEDESMA GONZALEZ and FERNANDO LEDESMA GONZALEZ
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Stimpson v. Ledesma et al
as 3:2026cv01903
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Stimpson
Defendant:
Jacobo Ledesma, III and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Gutierrez v. City of Greenville, South Carolina et al
as 6:2026cv02767
Plaintiff:
Francisco Ledesma Gutierrez
Defendant:
City of Greenville, South Carolina, Jennifer F Lane, AB Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02180
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
