Cases 11 - 20 of 93
LPP Mortgage LTD. v. Featherston et al
as 7:2017cv01277
Plaintiff:
LPP Mortgage LTD.
Defendant:
Paul Featherston and Merritt Featherston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rebekah Gentry-Youngblood v. LPP Mortgage, Ltd., et al
as 16-6046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REBEKAH GENTRY-YOUNGBLOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
LPP MORTGAGE, LTD., JAMIE MORTON, MATTHEW GRAVES and others
Richard Duncan, et al v. MGC Mortgage, Inc., et al
as 16-13858
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD K. DUNCAN and ROBIN V. DUNCAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MGC MORTGAGE, INC. and LPP MORTGAGE LTD
LPP Mortgage Ltd. v. Caledonia Springs et al
as 2:2016mc00075
Defendant:
Caledonia Springs, Inc., Peter H. Chiang, Peter H. Chiang and others
Plaintiff:
LPP Mortgage Ltd., L.P.
LPP Mortgage Ltd
as 16-2464
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: LPP MORTGAGE LTD
Plaintiff - Respondent:
CURNEALL WATSON and LEONA B. WATSON
Debtor - Respondent:
CALENDONIA SPRINGS INC
Intervenor - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
WILMA A. LEWIS
In re: LPP Mortgage Ltd
as 16-2464
Petitioner:
In re: LPP MORTGAGE LTD
Respondent:
CURNEALL WATSON, LEONA B. WATSON and WILMA A. LEWIS
Debtor:
CALENDONIA SPRINGS INC
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Castelli et al v. MGC Mortgage Inc et al
as 2:2016cv00442
Defendant:
MGC Mortgage Inc and LPP Mortgage Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Castelli, Barbara Castelli and Louis Castelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Frazier v. LPP Mortgage Ltd et al
as 2:2016cv00795
Plaintiff:
Sara B Frazier
Defendant:
LPP Mortgage Ltd and MGC Mortgage Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LPP Mortgage Ltd., L.P. v. David W. Gates et al
as 2:2015cv10008
Defendant:
David W. Gates and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
LPP Mortgage Ltd., L.P.
Duncan et al v. MGC Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01792
Plaintiff:
Richard K. Duncan and Robin V. Duncan
Defendant:
MGC Mortgage, Inc. and LPP Mortgage LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
