Cases 11 - 20 of 29
League of Women Voters of Michigan et al v. Benson
as 2:2017cv14148
Plaintiff:
League of Women Voters of Michigan, William "Bill" J. Grasha, Roger J. Brdak and others
Defendant:
Ruth Johnson, Republican Congressional Delegation, Lee Chatfield and others
Petitioner:
William F. Carney, Jeff Cobb, Shelly Edgerton and others
Interested Party:
Robert LaBrant, Michigan Chamber of Commerce, Robert I. Schostak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kennedy v. Rupe et al
as 1:2017cv13187
Plaintiff:
Lana Kennedy
Defendant:
Kerri Rupe, Allison Kennedy, Janice Burgess and others
Burwell v. Lansing, City of et al
as 1:2017cv00813
Plaintiff:
Samantha Burwell
Defendant:
Lansing, City of , Rodney Christopher Anderson, Lana Hadzajilic Liskiewicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Estate of Claude Stevens et al v. Stewart et al
as 2:2017cv12507
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Claude Stevens and Sherry L. VanNortwick
Defendant:
Anthony H. Stewart , Willis Chapman, Francis Konieczki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Jamsen et al
as 4:2016cv13770
Plaintiff:
Derryl Watson
Defendant:
Charles Jamsen, Mary E. Boayue, Lana McCarthy and others
Knop v. Warren et al
as 2:2014cv10185
Plaintiff:
Lori Knop
Defendant:
Millicent Warren, Daniel Heyns, Sylvia McQueen and others
Moon et al v. Warren et al
as 2:2014cv10195
Plaintiff:
Resheda Moon, Iesha Northington, Ursula Heard and others
Defendant:
Millicent Warren, Daniel Heyns, Syllvia McQueen and others
PNC Bank, National Association v. Amber's & Associates, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv11777
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, N A
Defendant:
Amber's & Associates, Inc. and Lana Saleh
Coach, Inc. et al v. Purse Rack LLC, The et al
as 1:2012cv01135
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Purse Rack LLC, The, Lana J. Face, William G. Face and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
